What our clients say.
We can't publish another director's numbers without their permission. Where we have it, we show the work in full — the before is the client's own submitted data, the after is the modelled end state of the restructure.
Client case study and video testimonials
Landmarked Developments
A proven builder — 16 dwellings, eight developments, two and a half years — running $3.23M of revenue through one bank account, one spreadsheet system and one person. The work was never the problem. The measurement was. We found $3.23M in revenue converting to roughly $9,000 of surplus, and traced every dollar of the gap: a margin priced at 15–17% and delivered at 12–16%, 301 days of unrecovered programme overrun, $8,250 of completed variations never invoiced, and preconstruction given away free. Then we costed the fix.
Plus a development arm separated onto its own P&L, and a business that becomes saleable and bankable at an indicative enterprise value of $1.25M – $1.75M — where a one-person business is worth little beyond its work in hand.
Summary: Andrew from Landmarked Developments says Better Business Australia under-promised and over-delivered, saved him time and money, and made a world of difference.
Before figures are drawn from the client's own submitted assessment of 18 August 2026. After figures are the modelled end state of a full restructure — 90-day blueprint executed plus twelve months of sustained execution — and are indicative estimates of opportunity, not a forecast, valuation or guarantee of outcome. They have not been verified against source records. Published with the client's written permission.
In their own words
Summary: Jason, who owns an accounting firm in North Sydney, says he put his business through the audit, found it in depth, implemented around 70% of the suggestions with help from BBA's tech team, and calls it one of the best things he has done for his business and personal life. He mentions that he knows one of BBA's owners and has previously done consulting work for him.
How an audit's findings are modelled
This is a made-up practice used to show how we model findings. It is not a testimonial, not a client and not a result. Every figure in it is modelled.
Example Practice A · an illustrative accounting firm
An illustrative practice: well-run, well-liked — nine people, 620 clients, twenty-two years of goodwill — producing exactly what the sector average produces. $1.85M of fee revenue produces $259,000 because eighteen percent of recorded time is never billed, forty percent of the book is priced at yesterday's rates, and the highest-value work the firm does is given away inside compliance meetings. The practice is not underworked. It is underpriced and unmeasured.
Plus ~$365,000 of working capital released as lockup falls from 78 to 32 days, a second signing reviewer appointed so the principal leaves the critical path, and two seniors placed on a documented equity pathway. At a sustained $900,000 EBIT the practice becomes saleable and bankable — indicatively 3.5–4.5× EBIT, or $3.1M – $4.0M, against roughly $1.6M for a compliance-weighted, principal-dependent practice of the same size.
Illustrative example prepared by Better Business Australia. The practice is fictional and is not a client. Figures are indicative estimates of opportunity under full implementation of the 90-day blueprint and twelve months of sustained execution; they are not a forecast, valuation or guarantee of outcome and have not been verified against source records. Structuring, licensing, taxation and valuation items require advice from appropriately qualified professionals.